Kubisa

So fun fact, someone poked me and linked me that thread where you wrote something about this KY person a few days ago <3

Not sure why ya were banned anyway, regardless of all that ya seem like a cool person to have a convo with.

Negged .

No breh. Come at me breh.

Did you see your rep?

I haven't posted a single lie. I m not disingenuous It's just that nobody asked me anything for real. How can you blame me for not sharing a life story when you never asked? Motherfucker I thought you were smarter than that.

Unbanned already?

That's not what I wanted to hear

what was your favorite part of the jokesub?

Yeah, that's the problem, people are always wanting over their original buying price, profit profit profit, not taking into account the state of the property and the fixing up the buyer will have to do, ugh, H&S regulations.... up to code my man, make sure its up to code!

Well, we could do that, but I won't be wearing the uniform, and I certainly wont be cleaning <3

Ugh, times are bloody rough in matters of the property market, I can't imagine how it is for business properties...

Oooooh Brighton, how is it there, a few friends of mine went over there last year love it...

I'm working myself into an early grave, still freelancing, some of the jobs I used to do have been cut, so I'm taking everything I can get at the moment :/

Kubi-kun, how are you

Did you manage to get to that pub?

You've been rather inactive lately. I can only assume real life is going well.

Prepare your body

Dunno what is going on between you and Mael but reading the same reports is getting really old. Any chance you two could send one another love letters via private messaging?

But...you're wrong, so there's no need to say it.

But we can't because nothing was violated nor were any boundaries crossed. You're only appealing to what you consider a societal view, whereas your original argument of legality and technicality fell flat when I showed you the DSM and how criminal law views it.

There's nothing to concede since it's pretty much a failure to get the facts right. Now please go away.

No, we can't.

Then you're doing it wrong. Congrats.

I'm more inquisitive since I heard nothing of the sort. But seeing how you only follow hearsay I can already tell that you can't do the research to appropriately designate terminology. Case in point, your failure to prove anything so far.

No it isn't. One's done by professionals and the other one is society's perception. Now you're just desperate.

Also you have no evidence on the Gabzilla bit but it's cute you try.

Which in this case made it completely fine, but society's perception does not dictate fact.

You still are moving the goalposts since you ignore the DSM itself. What I have at least tried to do is show you academia, whereas you've given me only your interpretation. And so far you've yet to show me any solid evidence and so far this is just some dumb shit Ari brought up because apparently it's hard to let go of things which by the way also warranted a ban for some time, and will so again.

But yeah dude you've been at this for some time so I will actually be reporting you.

I did produce the goods. What you're doing is asinine trolling, but since you insist:
"In research environments, specific terms are used for chronophilias: for instance, ephebophilia to refer to the sexual preference for mid-to-late adolescents,[1] hebephilia to refer to the sexual preference for earlier pubescent individuals, and pedophilia to refer to the sexual preference for prepubescent children.[5] http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10508-008-9422-1 "

"However, the term pedophilia is commonly used to refer to any sexual interest in minors below the legal age of consent, regardless of their level of physical, mental, or psychological development."
"Each U.S. state (and the District of Columbia) has its own age of consent. Currently state laws set the age of consent at 16, 17 or 18. The most common age is 16."
http://www.age-of-consent.info/

So basically...it's a loss for you, since there was never anything below 16.

Now really dude, crawl back into the Plaza or I'll be reporting your ass til Kingdom come.

I know...I just don't care because if you're going to engage in this sort of idiotic behavior then I suggest you go and do the research yourself.

I'm only giving you the tools since you wanted to open up a false accusation. Now go away.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent#.22Age.22

Negative. Psychology dictates that ephebophilia distinguishes itself from pedophilia in regards to pubescence and adolescence. What's funny is that your quoted text doesn't throw out a number. You just move the goalposts as such. The Model Penal Code and most criminal law systems use the DSM to determine psychological issues and their appropriate usage in determining legal guilt and the mens rea of any perp.

You still lose man. Now just go away.

Nope, you're moving the goalposts. The DSM-IV makes the cut-off at 13. You're done.

Now if you said ephebophilia then you'd make an argument, since the paragraphs later draw the distinction between adolescence, and legal interpretation relies on the DSM-IV.

You lose. Good day sir.

Now go away or it's report time.

DSM-IV: "Child or children below the age of puberty (usually 13 years of age or younger) [...]"

You fail at your own citation. Now please stop harassing me.

Oh so you don't actually know?

Concession accepted.

But it's pretty sad to be digging up two year old events.

Still missing that citation man.

And so what about Gabzilla? Where did that even come from?