This turned into a nice debate at the table at the hookah place tonight. And I was just wondering what you guys think, you could call this a cloning thread, but we are concentrating mostly the idea of awarness and whether or not when you duplicate someone that goes with them. You can't say that person is the same person, but how much of our memories are what make us human, how much of that is awarness. I'll lay down some good points to think about here, like the fact that you can say a person who has no capacity to remember anything, they would still be aware of themselves, of the world around them, and have a level of awarness higher than than of an animal, that is what I think makes us human. Memories may Individualize the human, but its not what makes us aware. More so I don't think having the exact chemical makeup as something that is human makes you human. Like to say that because A is exactly like B, doesn't mean that A has all of the rights and privilages like that B has or vice versa. Lets think of it as two glasses, one glass is just like the other. But then by some unseen force, the first glass gets a lid, the lid fits on it and is not part of the glass. The glasses would be the same otherwise, but the lid is seperate and yet adds to it. That is how I see the soul.