1. Due to an update, many default preferences have changed.

    If you have any issues, such as unrequested email notifications or following threads you didn't want to follow, then check your setting here.
  2. Stop Scrolling! We changed our address to narutoforums.org

    Please add the URL to bookmarks on your PC and phone.

    More details can be found here. Feel free to ask any question.
  3. Give your waifu the ultimate gift - being crowned the most popular waifu on NF by helping her win in Senjou’s “NF Waifu Popilarity Contest”

    Feeling extra confident? You can now bet on your Waifu as well for fun forum prizes here

    Come on with everything your waifu does for, you should do this for your waifu.
  4. Impending Naruto Avenue Reorganisation!

    Want to learn more? Wish to chime in? Click here.
  5. The latest NF Newsletter is out (October), read it here

Possible changes to reputation system

Discussion in 'The Konoha Times' started by Crowe, Mar 22, 2009.

Which option do you think is the best for the forum? PLEASE READ OPENING POST

  1. Removing neg rep

    299 vote(s)
    46.6%
  2. The rep in rep power is gone and ranks past 100K are gone/100K is renamed

    343 vote(s)
    53.4%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Crowe inactive - most of the time

    Messages:
    15,457
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    We appreciate any ideas/advices you might have but remember that the reason why we are even considering this is because the current system is causing too much problem. We might not even make any changes but we removed that option since we want to know which of these two option you might consider best for the forum and for yourself.
     
  2. Taxman Rail Tracer Supporting Staff Lord of the Lock

    Messages:
    26,942
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    39
    Reputation:
    It looks like I'm going to need to explain a few things....

    I hope my "will rape for food" avy keeps your attention enough to at least brace for this tl;dr...

    We specifically said that no matter what you voted for, it didn't necessarily mean that we were going to perform that action.

    We could do option one (though I personally dislike this one)
    We could do option two (which makes a bit more sense to me, but hey...I'd rather follow Mad Stan's philosophy and blow the whole thing up..or just stop caring about it myself).
    We could make it a free-for-all. (S_S would love this)
    We could keep it as is. (which we knew most of you would vote for anyway thus why it wasn't even a poll option)
    We could even change the rules around!

    Staff members believe the system is flawed due to the increasing amount of rep complaints and abuses we've been having to look into...so we wanted a solution for the question "how do we make the rep system less flawed?"

    Staff members inherently believe that "repwhoring is bad" because it defaces what "rep" was originally intended to do...feedback and how contributive a member is. For some reason we wish to get rep to fairly show who is a contributive member and who is just a basic spammer and troll :awesome

    Some staff members believe that repwhoring is cheating a system (that is quite arbitrary anyway) due to a lack of feasible contributions.

    Some staff members are thinking for the little guy, yet think the reason why people whore is to neg people with a bigger neg PUNCH (which isn't necessarily true...whoring happens to stroke egos...but stroking egos does give some of you guys too much power to ruin a newbies day and thus come whining to us and then we (the smods and admins) go looking into the comment left and only find an image of yamato wood or a big red cock rooster which ends up getting you and your friends rep sealed and then we get a bitchfest from both sides...just really puts us off and we get more complaints than most people in this thread probably think we get).

    Don't deny it...gang negs on noobies and other members have been done for ridiculous reasons. It certainly doesn't help seeing the "order of the red cock", or members of GB and UG, etc. go through this...nor is it "fun" having to deal with the latest victim of a mass neg from a group formed by members with the largest rep powers who may or may not have gotten their reps from non-contributive manners (and no "being inherently awesome" doesn't count :sag)

    Some staff members are like Spy Smasher and only want to see the world burn (ha I knew I'd get a TDK reference in here somewhere)

    Also, we should probably mention that removing the ranks after 500k, instead of 100k, has been discussed. We'd just change the last rank to "member has won the game CONGRATS!" The reason why impossible ranks are even being considered for removal is because they are impossible to obtain. duh.

    Giving people a goal is great...but even some goals are completely unrealistic. Make it possible for anyone to win the rep game. When you've won the rep game, it doesn't necessarily mean you can't find a new game to play amirite? So we change the last rank to you "winning" at some contest for internet numbers and then you go off and want to win at another game like the contests and being the most awesome member ever award. Or make a new game amongst your friends on who can reach the next level of 100k and force your friends to make a set for you about how you won amongst them :awesome (since we'd be removing the whoring rules with option 2 so we wouldn't really care about your new game as long as comments didn't derail a thread)

    Back to the point I guess...We wanted to see what you guys thought between the two most "extreme" solutions of the question "how do we make the rep system less flawed"

    In no way does this mean we'll actually remove negs or remove "reputation" from the rep power equation.

    And hey...most of all...you guys can use this as a platform as to how you'd think the rep system could be better (of course let's be feasible here...you'll need to come up with something we can implement without the help of M.Bison and Tazmoholic)...so I guess changing up the rules :sag

    Sure this isn't a democracy, but we like to take serious suggestions seriously :amuse

    So if you guys have some intuitive suggestions on how you'd think the rep system could be better, now would be a good time to bring up ideas.

    (and god damn it if this appears as the last post in the thread or if my last point about you guys giving your input on how to make the rep system better is ignored, I'm fucking locking this thread so you guys are forced to read it *lol counter-intuitive FTL*).
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2009
  3. Ark 2.0 Working as intended

    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    116
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Reputation:
    argh....lad, this is highly cotroversial and i forsee great problems for this in the future...argh
     
  4. geG Very Rude

    Messages:
    18,473
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    Wait that was the whole problem with repwhoring and rep threads? Because you were afraid of negging?
     
  5. Ark 2.0 Working as intended

    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    116
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Reputation:
    argh...and flaming and what not, if someone is insulting and such you neg, so what now, wehen ever that happens you summon a mod...thats not very functional...argh
     
  6. geG Very Rude

    Messages:
    18,473
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    The second change doesn't sound good either, especially the getting rid of all ranks above 100k. Surely like half of the current active members have at least 100k.
     
  7. Kittan THIS FORUM HAS GONE TO SHIT

    Messages:
    1,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    Keep the negs, its a great way to express hate

    Don't remove the ranks if you were to do the latter, they're there to symbolize how much you have achieved in your forum run
     
  8. Saruto Penises everywhere

    Messages:
    1,375
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    REMOVE NEG REP?

    AHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    <this is a placeholder post btw, don't delete it>
     
  9. The Space Cowboy Unfair, Unjust, Human

    Messages:
    12,856
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    How is people getting bent out of shape about little red marks, and the reduction of some number on a server somewhere a problem? Negs are a decent way to express hatred without starting a post-consuming flame-war.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2009
  10. olaf Cthulhu Fhtagn!

    Messages:
    5,864
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    so if I flame or post exclitic picture in rep it will be allright?

    well fuck

    leave it as it is
     
  11. Loki custom title want a loki

    Messages:
    4,280
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    Well doesn't metter for me, you can change it or leave as it is .
     
  12. Ark 2.0 Working as intended

    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    116
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Reputation:
    argh...Pek please explain how only giving pos rep is gonna stop repwhores, it'll only make then stornger now that they can't get neged, and now the FCs can simply mass Pos each other without fear of reprecursion, i'm sorry but this plan of your is hight ineffeicent...argh
     
  13. Slips Fuck off

    Messages:
    10,593
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    Removing neg rep

    No thanks

    whats next

    ban cussing
    ban arguing


    For me its part of the forum and if it gets removed it would be a shame because a few people cried about internet points
     
  14. Saruto Penises everywhere

    Messages:
    1,375
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    I'll just point out that option 2 is completely without merit, because that reduces its role to merely reflecting post count and join date. Both of which are clearly visible anyway. So option 2 should really be, "remove rep altogether".
     
  15. Crowe inactive - most of the time

    Messages:
    15,457
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    Yatta yatta. Buhuuu, "mods ruining the forum" etc. Keep those posts in blender if you want.
    I don't know. I think the staff just loves to argue over a month in a thread with ~20 or so pages just for fun, since none of us have anything better to do.


    Keep this thread clean as said and if you blenderites want to bitch; do so in Blender. This is not guaranteed changes. Just choose one of the lesser evil-
     
  16. Kittan THIS FORUM HAS GONE TO SHIT

    Messages:
    1,379
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    The lesser evil would be the second one, without removing the ranks.
     
  17. Psallo a Cappella Basic bitch, get out my face.

    Messages:
    4,737
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    I would rather not make any changes. My view's skewed, though; I've just never had any issues with positive / negative reps. Personally, I believe people are bent out of shape by negative reps, especially when the messages are "I don't like _____" or "You're ______." The insults and negative reps on personal taste, while petty . . . one or two postive reps obliterate anyway. I guess I feel negative reps for any reason are not a big deal.

    Seconded; it seems as if it would / does cut down on people lunging for the "Report" icon.

    And if people isolating, or insulting one another because of the differences in negative / positive reps was the issue, removing negative reps will simply spur people to want more positive rep than the others.

     
  18. Hiroshi Retired Staff Retired Mod

    Messages:
    21,795
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    Maybe that they were encouraging repwhoring which was disallowed previously due the unfair adv. it put over other users. With these two plans repwhoring won't be looked after as they will be negated.

    613 members in total have ranks above 100K - which isn't a majority. But take into account how many users above this number have repwhored to achieve the higher ranks. That reduces this number. Definitely NOT half the current active members.

    With the no neg plan, people won't complain about repwhoring because it can't affect them via neg rep repercussion. People can't complain about rep whorers because everyone has an equal chance to just rep whenever to whomever in this term.
     
  19. Saruto Penises everywhere

    Messages:
    1,375
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    COULD I GET AN ANSWER, YO?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 22, 2009
  20. Hatifnatten Banned

    Messages:
    20,156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Reputation:
    keep the neg, remove the rep.
     
  21. Kenneth

    I AM THE PANTS

    Administrator

    Messages:
    17,595
    Likes Received:
    435
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Reputation:
    Well, ranks are kind of fun, and neg reps, well... Are abused more often than being used right. :ano I don't neg a lot myself because I don't see the use in giving out neg reps. =/
     
  22. Felt ベストガール Administrator

    Messages:
    51,645
    Likes Received:
    1,002
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Reputation:
    Hi there, I would first like to ask why This thread was left open when you clearly had plans of your own with no consideration for the members. That thread had a poll, as you can see the poll clearly shows that the majority of people want the system left the same, so you have either completely ignored that and hence not cared for what the members want. Or you have listened and chose to completely go against the members, which again is not caring for the members.

    You are the moderators of this forum, this is not a business, there will be things that some people do not want but the majority DO WANT. Why do you feel the need to change something like this? I know that you as the staff have the overall say and what I'm saying has no reflextion on your actions but you are doing this for your personal gain and not for the enjoyment of the members.

    If you ignored the other poll then you'll probably ignore this poll to, you don't have any interest in what we want so just go ahead and make your own minds up, we mean nothing to you.

    Spoiler:
    balls
     
  23. robotnik Banned

    Messages:
    303
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Reputation:
    man in the new system no one would've been able to neg me for that post

    but now you can
     
  24. colours ava by Big Boss

    Messages:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    276
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Reputation:
    hm, ok

    i dislike both options so i choose option "none of the above"
     
  25. Miss Happy ♥ cuteholic ♥

    Messages:
    3,094
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Reputation:
    Spoiler:
    add more cute faces please!:iria
    please!Please!Please!
    PPPPPPPPPPPPLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSS!

    if you don't do that i'll gonna die!:zaru
    They are very important for my daily existence...:amuse
    oh and don't keep the negs they are ugly :hmpf
     
  26. Vandal Savage The Magician Supporting Staff

    Messages:
    42,641
    Likes Received:
    92
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Reputation:
    For some on the staff that was the only problem with rep whoring. Unfair rep powers negging others with their powers.

    If someone flames report it.

    613 at 100K or above.

    110 at 500K or above.

    Try dealing with 400 active members with a great portion of them abusing their rep either way.

    It isn't going to stop rep whores. In the views of some, it just stops mattering since they won't have unfair neg power to use against others.

    They won't.

    It is removing the main problems with rep power to begin with more or less.

    Removing rep altogether probably won't be happening.
     
  27. Felt ベストガール Administrator

    Messages:
    51,645
    Likes Received:
    1,002
    Trophy Points:
    116
    Reputation:
    Put a 3rd option none of the above, it will show you where we stand.
     
  28. Ark 2.0 Working as intended

    Messages:
    2,689
    Likes Received:
    116
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Reputation:
    argh...they why not remove rep then, then all problems would be solved since without negs it losses its purpose...argh
     
  29. CyberSwarmKing Banned

    Messages:
    2,367
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Reputation:
    Better get rid of negs than ranks :argh

    I mean ranks are fun and are some motivation towards quality posting.

    Negging can be abused anyway.
     
  30. Teach Dio

    Messages:
    18,904
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Reputation:
    Keep the rep ranks but remove the rep in rep power
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page